DU PhD admissions irregularities spark controversy as DUSU president Ronak Khatri alleges unfair selection and violation of UGC guidelines. The university denies claims, insisting on transparency. Read more on the ongoing dispute.
Allegations of irregularities in DU PhD admissions have surfaced. Delhi University Studentsā Union (DUSU) president Ronak Khatri has raised concerns about transparency and fairness. He claims the selection process violates University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines. He also alleges the reservation policy is being ignored. However, the university administration has denied these claims. They state the process is conducted fairly.
Claims of Irregularities in DU PhD Admissions
Khatri has accused Delhi University (DU) of not following the prescribed admission criteria. He claims the university is overemphasizing interviews and reducing the weightage of NET scores.
As per UGC guidelines, 70% of the selection weightage should come from NET scores. The remaining 30% should be based on interviews. However, Khatri alleges that DU has granted admissions based only on interviews. He claims this has led to biased selections.
Khatri has also raised concerns about transparency. He states that no department, except the English Department, has disclosed the marks obtained by selected candidates. This lack of disclosure raises serious doubts about fairness.
Accusations of Reservation Policy Violation
Khatri has also highlighted issues with the reservation policy. General category seats were traditionally open to all candidates, while reserved category seats were allotted to Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC).
However, Khatri claims SC, ST, and OBC students are being restricted to their reserved categories. They are not allowed to compete for general seats. He believes this practice goes against fair selection and equal opportunity.
Bribery Allegations in the Selection Process
Khatri has further alleged that bribery is influencing DU PhD admissions. He claims some candidates are being selected based on personal and ideological connections rather than merit.
If true, these allegations point to a major scandal within the universityās admission system.
DU PhD Admissions Irregularities: DU Administrationās Response
The DU administration has strongly denied these allegations. DU Registrar Vikas Gupta has stated that the university follows all guidelines strictly. He insists that DU ensures transparency in the admission process.
He also asserts that the reservation policy is being implemented correctly. Additionally, he says that no official complaints have been received regarding these concerns.
Gupta clarifies that PhD admissions have been conducted in three phases. This, he says, ensures that the maximum number of candidates get a fair chance. He further states that all relevant details about admissions are available on the admissions dashboard.
Interview Weightage in DU PhD Admissions
Gupta insists that DU is following the 70-30 weightage rule for NET scores and interviews. He explains that the Departmental Research Committee makes the final selection based on these criteria.
He also questions why the allegations target all departments except the English Department.
Lack of Transparency in the Selection List
Despite DUās denial, Khatri argues the university is not being transparent. He points out that selected candidatesā marks are not shown in the selection list.
He claims that ideological affiliations are influencing admissions. He also alleges that hostel allotments and even assistant professor selections are affected.
DU PhD Admissions Irregularities: Demand for an Investigation
Khatri has called for an independent investigation into these alleged irregularities. He has urged the Ministry of Education to form a committee to probe the matter.
He warns that this is just the beginning. He promises to expose more irregularities in the coming weeks.
Concerns About DUās Reputation
If Khatriās claims are proven true, DUās reputation could suffer. The university is one of Indiaās most prestigious institutions. Allegations of bias, bribery, and unfair selection could damage its credibility.
On the other hand, if DUās stance is correct, these allegations could be politically motivated. The universityās admission process is already under scrutiny. Further investigations could either confirm or disprove these claims.
Conclusion
The controversy over DU PhD admissions irregularities continues to grow. DUSU president Ronak Khatri alleges unfair selection. The university, however, denies any wrongdoing.
The demand for an independent probe is gaining momentum. The final outcome will determine whether the universityās admissions are fair. If not, serious reforms may be needed.
