Delhi HC Grants Admission to 7 Students at St. Stephen’s College

Delhi HC grants admission to seven students at St. Stephen’s College after a heated legal battle over DU’s seat allocation. Discover the full story behind the court’s ruling and its impact!

The Delhi High Court has directed St. Stephen’s College to admit seven students. It is based on the seat allocation system of Delhi University. This decision comes after two petitions were filed by these students. All of them had been allotted seats by the university but were not granted admission.

The court’s order is seen as a relief for these students who had qualified for courses at St. Stephen’s College but faced delays in admission. The college had opposed the allocation system set by Delhi University (DU), leading to a legal dispute.

Delhi HC Grants Admission: Key Highlights

• • Court Verdict: Delhi HC grants admission to seven students at St. Stephen’s College.
  • Dispute: The college opposed DU’s seat allocation system, leading to legal petitions.
  • Student Eligibility: Students qualified for BA Economics (Hons) and BA Programme courses.
  • Courses in Question: Admission was sought for the BA Economics (Hons) and BA Programme.

Delhi HC Grants Admission: Background of the Case

The issue began when the university allocated seats to seven students. It is only for some specific courses at St. Stephen’s College. Despite being qualified and meeting all formalities, the college failed to complete its admissions within the allocated time. The students sought legal help to resolve the situation.

The main argument of the students was that they were entitled to admission based on DU’s seat allocation. Their qualifications included passing the Common University Entrance Test (CUET). They also followed the necessary procedures for admission.

Delhi HC Grants Admission: Important Points

• • Admissions: The students had completed all required formalities and cleared the CUET.
  • Legal Action: Two petitions were filed by the students seeking court intervention.

College’s Opposition to DU’s Policy

St. Stephen’s College opposed Delhi University’s seat allocation system. The college argued that they are only able to admit students within their sanctioned limit. However, the university maintained that the seat allocation system must be followed.

The college’s stance delayed the admission process for these seven students, leading them to approach the Delhi High Court. In response, the high court decided in favour of the students, granting them admission.

Delhi HC Grants Admission: Dispute Summary

• • College’s Stand: St. Stephen’s College opposed the seat allocation system set by DU.
  • University’s Position: DU supported the petitions and asked the college to follow its seat allocation system.

Court’s Ruling

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma was presiding over the case. He directed St. Stephen’s College to grant admission to the seven students. The court emphasized that the university’s seat calculation had not been challenged. Further, the college must follow it for these admissions. The decision allows the students to attend classes after completing the necessary formalities.

The court also made it clear that these students should not be penalized for any procedural delay. They should be granted admission immediately.

Key Court Directions

• • Grant Admission: Delhi HC grants admission to the seven students.
  • Seat Allocation Policy: The college must adhere to DU’s seat allocation system.

Provisional Admissions and Division Bench Ruling

Initially, a single-judge bench had granted provisional admissions to six students. The court acknowledged that these students did not fault the delay, having cleared the CUET and completed all formalities.

However, St. Stephen’s College challenged this order before a division bench. The bench barred the students from attending classes while the case was still pending. The seventh student, who was also part of the case, approached the court later.

Admission Under Single Girl Child Quota

Another significant point of contention was the ‘single girl child quota’ introduced by Delhi University. This quota reserves one seat in each programme of every college for single girl children. This is under a supernumerary quota rule implemented a few months ago. Some of the petitioners were seeking admission under this quota, adding another layer of complexity to the case.

Key Points

• • Provisional Admission: Initially granted to six students but later challenged by the college.
  • Single Girl Child Quota: Some petitioners applied under this special quota.

Delhi HC Grants Admission: Conclusion

The Delhi High Court’s ruling is a victory for the seven students. They were previously denied admission despite their qualifications and DU seat allocation. The court emphasized the importance of following the university’s allocation system. Delhi HC has directed St. Stephen’s College to grant admission promptly.

This ruling highlights the ongoing tension between individual colleges and the centralized admission system of Delhi University. But, for these seven students, the decision ensures they can now continue their academic journey without further delays.

Final Points

• • Delhi HC grants admission to students after resolving the dispute.
  • Single Girl Child Quota was a significant aspect of the case.
  • The university’s Allocation System prevails over the college’s opposition.

This case underscores the importance of centralized policies and their role in ensuring fair admission processes across universities.

FOR MORE UPDATES ON DELHI UNIVERSITY FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM

ALSO READ: St. Stephen Exceeds Christian Quota in Seat Allocation 2024, DU Raises Concerns